New business models for hill farming
The report notes that, in the UK, many upland livestock farms are only profitable because of government subsidies. As the subsidies are likely to be phased out in their current form by 2021, the report searched for alternative business models that would make farms more likely to survive without such payments, using interviews with farmers.
One recommendation is that, by reducing stock numbers to the level that can be supported entirely on the farm’s natural grass growth, farmers can increase their profit margins by making savings on variable costs such as fertiliser - in contrast to the assumption of some farmers that profitability can only be increased by increasing production. This would also have environmental benefits such as avoiding overgrazing and reducing the need to produce cereals for animal feed. According to the report, the current situation for hill farms is one of “high numbers generally being reliant on bought in feedstuffs and the use of artificial fertilisers to improve the grass yield on the farm.”
The report also notes that, if its recommendations fail to make farms profitable, then the land may have to be released for other uses such as building, afforestation or rewilding.
Read the full report, Less is more: Improving profitability and the natural environment in hill and other marginal farming systems, here (PDF link). See also the Foodsource resource How far could changes in production practices reduce GHG emissions?
Europe is the world's second-smallest continent by surface area, covering just over 10 million square kilometres or 6.8% of the global land area, but it is the third-most populous continent after Asia and Africa, with a population of around 740 million people or about 11% of the world's population. Its climate is heavily affected by warm Atlantic currents that temper winters and summers on much of the continent. In the European Union, farmers represent only 4.7% of the working population, yet manage nearly half of its land area.