Organic agriculture, food security, and the environment
This review paper reports that organic agriculture has lower yields than conventional agriculture, by 19-25% on average across all crops, according to three meta-analyses. Lower yields may be due to the lack of use of synthetic fertilisers - organic systems are often limited by low levels of nitrogen or phosphorus - and higher susceptibility to pest outbreaks. Widespread uptake of organic farming (to produce the same amounts of output as today) would probably require some conversion of natural habitats to farmland, because of this lower land-use efficiency compared to conventional agriculture - an important consideration, as the area of certified organic production has increased from 15 million ha in 2000 to 51 million ha in 2015 (although this is only 1% of agricultural land).
Organic agriculture, compared to conventional agriculture and measured per unit of output (rather than per unit of land area used), generally generates higher greenhouse gas emissions; uses less energy; generates higher ammonia, eutrophying and acidifying emissions; and lower or similar total greenhouse gas emissions. Organic agriculture may have benefits for soil quality and on-farm biodiversity.
Regarding food security, the paper suggests that organic agriculture could feed the population in 2050 without requiring habitat loss in the scenario of diets becoming entirely vegan. However, organic agriculture could also give rise to higher food prices, with potentially negative impacts on food security for poorer people, particularly in developing countries.
Thanks to FCRN member Emma Garnett for bring this paper to our attention.
Organic agriculture is often perceived as more sustainable than conventional farming. We review the literature on this topic from a global perspective. In terms of environmental and climate change effects, organic farming is less polluting than conventional farming when measured per unit of land but not when measured per unit of output. Organic farming, which currently accounts for only 1% of global agricultural land, is lower yielding on average. Due to higher knowledge requirements, observed yield gaps might further increase if a larger number of farmers would switch to organic practices. Widespread upscaling of organic agriculture would cause additional loss of natural habitats and also entail output price increases, making food less affordable for poor consumers in developing countries. Organic farming is not the paradigm for sustainable agriculture and food security, but smart combinations of organic and conventional methods could contribute toward sustainable productivity increases in global agriculture.
Meemken, E.M. and Qaim, M., 2018. Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, Review in Advance.
Read the full article here. See also the Foodsource resource How far could changes in production practices reduce GHG emissions?
While some of the food system challenges facing humanity are local, in an interconnected world, adopting a global perspective is essential. Many environmental issues, such as climate change, need supranational commitments and action to be addressed effectively. Due to ever increasing global trade flows, prices of commodities are connected through space; a drought in Romania may thus increase the price of wheat in Zimbabwe.
More like this
- Many shades of gray – the context-dependent performance of organic agriculture
- Australian organic vs conventional agriculture paper
- Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century: a farming practice that can help feed the future if done right
- Environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming
- The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets