Do High Consumers of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Respond Differently to Price Changes? A Finite Mixture IV-Tobit Approach
This study compared the impact that a 20 per cent sales tax and a 20 cents per litre excise tax on beverages such as carbonated non-diet soft drinks, cordials and fruit drinks would have on moderate and high consumers. It found that although high consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages have the least elastic demand, they drink so much that they are up against household budget limits, and therefore adding tax would bring down their consumption.
The study also found that an excise tax was more effective than a sales tax of similar levels at reducing consumption rates, especially for heavy drinkers. It also found that adding the tax tax to all sugar-sweetened drinks would mean only a small financial burden for those who drank them at low or medium rates. Overall the paper concludes that the introduction of the tax would be cost effective and deliver significant health benefits.
Note that an excise tax is a tax levied upon the producer while a sales tax is levied on the consumer.
This study compares the impact of a sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) tax between moderate and high consumers in Australia. The key methodological contribution is that price response heterogeneity is identified while controlling for censoring of consumption at zero and endogeneity of expenditure by using a finite mixture instrumental variable Tobit model. The SSB price elasticity estimates show a decreasing trend across increasing consumption quantiles, from −2.3 at the median to −0.2 at the 95th quantile. Although high consumers of SSBs have a less elastic demand for SSBs, their very high consumption levels imply that a tax would achieve higher reduction in consumption and higher health gains. Our results also suggest that an SSB tax would represent a small fiscal burden for consumers whatever their pre-policy level of consumption, and that an excise tax should be preferred to an ad valorem tax. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Etilé, F., Sharma, A., Special Issue Paper, Do High Consumers of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Respond Differently to Price Changes? A Finite Mixture IV-Tobit ApproachHeath economics
Read the full paper here.
This region of Oceania comprises Australia, New Zealand, the island of New Guinea, and neighbouring islands in the Pacific Ocean. Its ecozone forms a distinct region with a common geologic and evolutionary history which has resulted in a set of unique types of animals and plants. Due to the reverse seasonality with the US and Europe, much food produce is exported to these countries in the winter from Australia and New Zealand. Except for the lush rainforest of Queensland and the east, much of the Australia is arid and unsuitable for arable agriculture. The country is considered highly vulnerable to climate change and associated impacts including droughts and wildfires.
More like this
- Soda tax boosts retail prices of sugary drinks
- Soft drink sugar tax could be effective weapon in war against obesity
- Legal and administrative feasibility of a federal junk food and sugar-sweetened beverage tax to improve diet
- Simulating the impact on health of internalising the cost of carbon in food prices combined with a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages
- Sweet snack tax may beat sweet drink tax