Number-crunching could lead to unethical choices, says new study
A recent study published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes explores the perils of conducting economic research in a vacuum. The researchers found that after completing a lesson in calculative economics participants were significantly more likely to behave in selfish ways and ‘engage in unethical behaviors to better themselves’. However, those participants who instead completed a history lesson (in this case specifically on the industrial revolution) were less likely to behave selfishly after.
These results were repeated to a lesser degree when participants were asked to engage in maths and verbal problem sets. Such outcomes may shed light not only on economic students’ tendency towards self interest but also on the relationship between business and economics education and its relationship to unethical corporate activity.
Highlights as identified by the authors:
- Rational models suggest that decisions be calculative.
- But calculating does not always fit for social and moral problems.
- We show that a calculative mindset leads to selfish and unethical action.
- We also show that a simple social-awareness prompting can limit these effects.
- And that utilitarian thinking and dampened emotions partially explain these effects.
Rational choice models suggest that decisions should be both deliberate and calculative. In contrast, the current research suggests that calculations may lead to unintended social and moral consequences. We tested whether engaging in a calculative task would lead decision makers to overlook the social and moral consequences of their subsequent decisions and act selfishly and unethically. In each of the first four experiments, participants first completed either a calculative or a comparable, non-calculative task followed by an ostensibly unrelated decision task (either a Dictator or a modified Ultimatum Game). Compared to the non-calculative tasks, completing the calculative tasks led people to be consistently more selfish in the Dictator Game and more unethical in the modified Ultimatum Game. A final experiment tested whether the calculative task led to more self-interested behavior through increased utilitarian judgments and dampened emotional reactions; it also examined whether a subtle, social intervention might mitigate these effects.
Wang, L., Zhong, C., Murnighan., J. K., 2014, The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125 (1): 39 DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.004
While some of the food system challenges facing humanity are local, in an interconnected world, adopting a global perspective is essential. Many environmental issues, such as climate change, need supranational commitments and action to be addressed effectively. Due to ever increasing global trade flows, prices of commodities are connected through space; a drought in Romania may thus increase the price of wheat in Zimbabwe.
More like this
- NGOs’ opposition to genome editing is rooted in scepticism about the framing of problems and solutions
- Interactive online investor guide on agricultural supply chain risk including climate change and deforestation
- People care less for animals if threatened by vegetarianism
- Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors
- Food bank nations: Poverty, corporate charity and the right to food