Voluntary non-monetary approaches for implementing conservation
Voluntary programs represent a widely accepted policy tool for biodiversity conservation on private land and are often market-based (monetary) rather than appealing to values and morals. A growing body of evidence suggests that market-based approaches to conservation, albeit effective and relevant in many cases, are not always sustainable in the long term.
Approaches aimed at inducing behavioural change in individuals based on intrinsic values and morals, rather than monetary incentives also exist, but these are less considered in conservation. 0.2% of papers published in ecology and conservation biology focused on non-monetary voluntary approaches compared to 1.6% on voluntary market-based approaches, which include nest-box provision and leaving hedgerows uncut for example.
The authors define the voluntary non-monetary approach as actions that citizens or organisations could voluntarily implement in their area of influence without monetary incentives. They review the scarce literature on the topic to investigate their potential in farmland conservation. They considered 119 actions available from “conservation evidence”, 16-17 of which were potentially suitable for implementation by a voluntary non-monetary approach on private land.
These could be widely applicable and uptake is likely to depend on encouragement (nudging) rather than coercive of financial emphasis (shoving). They state that to be effectively implemented by untrained actors, actions should be clearly defined, straightforward to implement and not require specific scientific knowledge and also note that a lack of encouragement or role models are often hampering factors for implementation. One solution is to use so called nudging to affect behaviour. Nudging is a method which works with human psychology, built on the theory of “choice architecture”, which has so far rarely been considered for nature conservation. Nudging is a way to influence human choices while preserving the freedom of choice of the individual. This paper argues that voluntary non-monetary approaches are currently underused and should be considered more by conservationists in the future.
The voluntary non-monetary approach to conservation refers to actions that citizens or organizations could voluntarily implement in their area of influence without the incentive of monetary compensations. To be effectively implemented by untrained actors, actions should be clearly defined, straightforward to implement and not require specific scientific knowledge. The costs of actions should also be sufficiently affordable to be widely applied without monetary incentives. A voluntary non-monetary approach has so far not been clearly described as a distinct group of tools for nature conservation. Here we review the scarce scientific literature on the topic. To illustrate the applicability of a voluntary non-monetary approach to conservation, we then investigate its potential for farmland conservation. We considered a list of 119 actions available from “conservation-evidence”, a source of systematically collected evidence on effectiveness of conservation actions. Among 119 actions, 95 could be scored for feasibility of implementation, costs, and existence of evidence in UK, Spain and Finland. Sixteen to seventeen actions were potentially suitable for implementation by a voluntary non-monetary approach. This implies that the voluntary non-monetary approach could be widely applicable across many countries and environments. It is our hope that this study will represent a clarion call for conservation scientists to clearly recognize the voluntary non-monetary approach, its characteristics, and its potential for addressing conservation issues on private land. Adoption of such voluntary measures may be more dependent on encouragement (‘nudging’) than on the usual coercive or financial emphasis (‘shoving’).
Santangeli, A., Arroyo, B., Dicks, L., Herzon, I., Kukkala, A., Sutherland, W. & Moilanen, A. (2016). "Voluntary non-monetary approaches for implementing conservation." Biological Conservation 197 209-214.
While some of the food system challenges facing humanity are local, in an interconnected world, adopting a global perspective is essential. Many environmental issues, such as climate change, need supranational commitments and action to be addressed effectively. Due to ever increasing global trade flows, prices of commodities are connected through space; a drought in Romania may thus increase the price of wheat in Zimbabwe.
More like this
- Global challenges require cross-cutting solutions: bringing together water, energy, and food policy
- Using regulation as a last resort? Assessing the performance of voluntary approaches
- Women in Agriculture: Four Myths
- Science and Technology Committee report on Behaviour Change
- Just conservation: What is it and should we pursue it?